London court dismisses poker player's £100k lawsuit against Hippodrome Casino
A London court has thrown out a £100,000 lawsuit brought by a poker player against Hippodrome Casino. Dr. Mortaza Sahibzada claimed he was unfairly banned for using a short-session strategy. The judge ruled in favour of the casino, calling the case groundless.
Dr. Sahibzada had accused Hippodrome Casino of wrongfully banning him in 2022. He argued that his 'hit-and-run' poker style—leaving tables after winning around £75—was the real reason for the exclusion. According to him, this 'innovative' method earned him up to £2,000 a month.
The casino’s legal team, led by Harry Stratton, dismissed the claim as 'totally without merit' and 'bound to fail'. They explained that the ban followed repeated conflicts with staff and other players, along with concerns about problem gambling. Judge Andrew Holmes agreed with the casino’s position. He stated that private businesses, including casinos, have the right to refuse service to anyone. The ruling confirmed that Hippodrome acted lawfully in banning Dr. Sahibzada.
The court’s decision means Dr. Sahibzada will receive no compensation. The judge’s ruling also reinforces the casino’s authority to set its own entry policies. No further legal action is expected in the case.
