Skip to content

What is the eco-friendly choice among search engines?

The escalating energy consumption in searches, driven by AI, remains challenging to quantify precisely.

What search engine is the greenest choice for customers?
What search engine is the greenest choice for customers?

What is the eco-friendly choice among search engines?

In the digital age, the debate over the environmental impact of search engines has gained traction. Martin Deron, a tech enthusiast, believes that tools that prioritise privacy, consume less energy, and refrain from advertising-based business models are the key to a greener internet.

Deron uses the American search engine Brave, which is known for its commitment to privacy, as an example. He also questions the environmental footprint of search engines like Ecosia that rely on Google and Microsoft for their search results. Ecosia's CEO, Christian Kroll, has expressed a desire for the company to not only be carbon neutral but also "carbon negative" through its production of solar energy.

However, the transparency of tech companies' environmental efforts is a concern for many users. Joëlle Gauthier, a reader, is seeking a search engine with a minimal carbon footprint. Google, Bing, and Yahoo are criticised for their low level of transparency regarding their environmental efforts.

Recent studies suggest that the energy demand for AI-based technologies in search results is increasing, leading to a rise in greenhouse gas emissions. Google's environmental footprint could be underestimated, with a recent study by the Kairos Fellowship suggesting a 65% increase in emissions over the past few years.

The rise of AI has also raised concerns about its potential for errors and misinformation. Both Deron and Luccioni invite users to remain critical of the role that AI plays in online search. Luccioni suggests avoiding unnecessary searching by going directly to a website by typing the URL in the search bar or saving it as a favourite.

In response to these concerns, several search engines have emerged offering greener options. Ecosia, Ecogine, Lilo, and Oceanhero are some examples. These search engines donate their advertising profits to reforestation or fund ecological initiatives and NGOs. Ecosia, in particular, is considered the most sustainable search engine because it invests its profits into environmental and climate projects.

Martin Deron also calls for more public debate on the environmental and resource implications of AI, as its expansion depends on limited resources like minerals, access to energy, and water. He expresses concern about the increasing infiltration of AI into all spheres of society, stating that it may limit our free will.

As we navigate the digital world, it is crucial to consider the environmental impact of our online actions. The debate on green search engines is a step towards a more sustainable internet, encouraging users to make informed decisions about their browsing habits.

Read also: