Skip to content

Western Union's Higher-than-Average Charges for Transfers

Spotlighting the price ramp-up in the fusion of Western Union and MoneyGram; simultaneously, providing a refreshed detail about Finablr.

Higher costs associated with Western Union transactions
Higher costs associated with Western Union transactions

Western Union's Higher-than-Average Charges for Transfers

In a significant development in the financial services industry, the potential acquisition of MoneyGram by Western Union is causing ripples. This potential merger is the subject of a detailed analysis in the latest Forbes column.

The implications of such a move are far-reaching, particularly in the cash-to-cash market where both Western Union and MoneyGram often dominate. One of the key concerns is the potential pricing power Western Union may gain in certain corridors and markets.

However, the deal's economics seem beneficial for both parties, offering a chance for synergies and increased market share. Yet, the acquisition remains contingent on several factors. Travelex, a significant player in the remittance sector, is currently facing financial difficulties. Travelex did not receive any acceptable offers and is currently in debt, owing €360m to bondholders and having a revolving credit facility of €90m.

The market incumbent, UAE Exchange, is running under capacity, potentially benefiting new digital players such as TransferWise. Reports have emerged of some customer refunds being made by UAE Exchange, indicating a gradual recovery from recent difficulties.

The potential acquisition could raise antitrust concerns due to market dominance. Western Union could potentially remove MoneyGram as a competitor in a corridor, potentially allowing for increased pricing. However, the role of new digital players in the market is unclear in terms of competition.

Western Union could also maintain MoneyGram as a lower-cost brand while continuing to charge a premium for its own services. This strategy could help Western Union to cater to a wider range of customers and markets.

Travelex has been given an additional window until 2 July to find a solution to move forward. The outcome of this situation will undoubtedly have implications for the entire remittance industry.

As the situation unfolds, it is clear that the remittance sector is undergoing significant changes, with traditional players facing challenges from digital disruptors and the potential for consolidation through acquisitions. The future of the industry remains uncertain, but one thing is certain: the remittance sector will continue to evolve and adapt to meet the needs of a globalised world.

Read also: