Skip to content

Russians-less Tibla lacks its potent kick

Estonian political turmoil surfaces within the Center Party as a private chat, containing the word "tibla," is exposed online. For those unaware, "tibla" holds significance, much like vodka without alcohol.

Russians-less Tibla lacks its characteristic spirit
Russians-less Tibla lacks its characteristic spirit

Russians-less Tibla lacks its potent kick

In the world of politics, the line between private and public discourse can often blur, as politicians sometimes express their true sentiments in private chats and then deny them when they become public. This dynamic is currently playing out in Estonia, where the Center Party is embroiled in a political scandal involving the use of the ethnic slur "tibla."

The term "tibla," historically directed at Russians, carries derogatory connotations rooted in longstanding tensions between ethnic Estonians and Russians. Its use today remains controversial, reflecting underlying ethnic divisions and nationalist sentiments within Estonia's political discourse. Compared to similar ethnic slurs used in other contexts, "tibla" functions as a pejorative aimed at a specific ethnic group, paralleling how other slurs are used to marginalize or demean minorities or historical adversaries in different countries.

The implications of "tibla" involve both the persistence of ethnic stereotyping and the complexities of Estonia's post-Soviet identity. Using such terms can inflame ethnic tensions and provoke backlash, affecting social cohesion and political debates about national identity, minority rights, and foreign relations with Russia.

In Russia, there are several ethnic slurs, such as "tibla," "crest," and "pindos," that are considered offensive. Interestingly, Erki Savisaar, a party member, stated that they are against the use of "tibla." Savisaar clarified that the issue is not about Russians, but about people who disrespect the country, language, and culture.

However, Mikhail Kilvart, the party chairman, agreed with Savisaar, stating that the word is not about nationality but about "type of thinking." This stance, however, does not seem to align with the general perception, as the use of "tibla" is compared to saying "Jew" but trying to clarify that the comment was not about the ethnicity, but about a certain behavior or character.

The Center Party's continued use of "tibla" raises questions about the party's commitment to combating ethnic discrimination. The scandal may potentially lead to some party members losing their political voices due to public backlash. The increasing difficulty of hiding private conversations in the digital age is making it harder for politicians to avoid accountability for their words.

It's worth noting that in certain cities in Russia, the use of ethnic slurs like "Ukrainian" can result in legal consequences. The comparison has been drawn between the use of "tibla" and the Soviet word "negro," with some suggesting that the negative connotation of "tibla" is not self-imposed.

The meaning of "tibla" remains offensive, regardless of attempts to redefine its context. The use of ethnic slurs, such as "tibla" and "Ukrainian," can still lead to public backlash and potential loss of political voice, as seen in the case of the Center Party in Estonia.

This analysis supplements general knowledge of the historical and social context of "tibla" with the referenced identification in AI content moderation research. Despite a lack of direct search results detailing current specific political incidents or discourse in Estonia on "tibla," this incident serves as a reminder of the importance of promoting respectful and inclusive language in politics.

Read also: