Skip to content

Reorganization efforts led by Secretary Rollins potentially reduce USDA's ability to serve farmers, livestock managers, and rural communities efficiently

USDA Reorganization Proposals Could Increase Department Challenges: A critique from a former official, arguing that the proposed changes may result in achieving less with fewer resources.

USDA's structural overhaul by Secretary Rollins could potentially lead to a decline in agricultural...
USDA's structural overhaul by Secretary Rollins could potentially lead to a decline in agricultural programs' reach towards farmers, ranchers, and rural communities

Reorganization efforts led by Secretary Rollins potentially reduce USDA's ability to serve farmers, livestock managers, and rural communities efficiently

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has announced a reorganization at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), a move that has sparked controversy and criticism from both within and outside the department.

The reorganization plan seeks to relocate core portions of the USDA workforce from the Washington, D.C. area to five regional hubs outside the Beltway. This move is aimed at bringing the workforce closer to the communities they serve, but critics argue it will have far-reaching consequences.

Rollins has criticized a modest 8% growth in the USDA workforce over the past four years, claiming there was no tangible increase in service to USDA's core constituencies. The reorganization plan, however, is expected to result in the complete vacating of the South Building and the removal of thousands of employees due to the reorganization.

Steven C. Silverman, who served as the director of USDA's National Appeals Division from 2014-2019 and as USDA's Principal Deputy General Counsel from 2009-2012, has been one of the most vocal critics of the reorganization plan. He asserts that the reorganization will reduce technical and financial services to farmers and ranchers, and will undermine relationships, generally weakening USDA's voice on behalf of the agriculture industry on Capitol Hill and within the Beltway community.

The GAO report from 2022 found that USDA's previous relocation of the Economic Research Service and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture "was not fully consistent with an evidenced-based approach." The current reorganization plan follows a similar pattern, with the administration's own numbers showing that only 4,600 of USDA's nearly 100,000-person workforce is located within the NCR.

The reorganization plan also risks accelerating an exodus of experienced professionals from the department. Removing thousands of officials from the NCR will disconnect senior program managers from the top echelons of leadership at the department. This could potentially lead to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise.

The asserted purpose of this mass exiling of employees is to bring the workforce closer to the communities they serve. However, specific details about these regions and the relocation strategy were not found in the provided search results.

The Trump administration's USDA reorganization plans to relocate the remaining USDA workforce into four regions: the Midwest, the South, the West, and the Northeast. The administration will likely ask remaining workers to accomplish more with less, as Rollins complained about a 14.5% pay raise for federal workers not covering increased costs of living.

This reorganization has been considered a dismissal of the value of USDA employees, and Silverman, now an adjunct professor of law at the University of Colorado Law School, warns that the repercussions of this move could be significant and long-lasting. A similar gambit was attempted during the first Trump administration, when USDA abruptly relocated many of its research programs from the NCR to Kansas City. The current reorganization plan seems to follow a similar pattern, raising concerns about its effectiveness and impact on the USDA and the agriculture industry as a whole.

Read also: