Skip to content
General-news — Lottery — Sports betting — Line — Lotteries — Dana — Prohibiting — Politics — Finance — Offered — Casino-and-gambling — Wager — Sporadically

Persisting Legal Dispute Over Lottery Results Nearing Its End

Despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic's impact on retail, lottery sales have significantly dropped. Nevertheless, the heated federal dispute concerning lotteries persists.

,   and  Administrator
3 min read
Amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, retail lottery sales continue to tumble down, but the battle...
Amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, retail lottery sales continue to tumble down, but the battle between federal authorities over lotteries persists vigorously.

Unraveling the Legal Gridlock: A Tale of Lotteries and Bureaucracy

The legal tangles surrounding gambling can stretch longer than a game of chance, with arguments becoming archaic before judgments are passed. This is neatly encapsulated by New Hampshire's ongoing lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)—a tussle initiated over the DOJ's controversial December 2018 opinion that cast a shadow on all lotteries across the nation due to the advent of technology.

As Michigan Attorney General, Dana Nessel, recently acknowledged, government-operated lotteries in the U.S. raked in a staggering $80 billion in gross revenues in 2017. These funds underwrite essential services such as education, ecological protection, and infrastructure development.

Slashed Jackpots Amid Global Pandemic

With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing nations into lockdown, state lottery sales at retailers have plummeted. In response, Powerball slashed its minimum annuity jackpot size in half from $40 million to $20 million. The interim increase between drawings has also been reduced from $10 million to $2 million.

Amidst this tumultuous economic climate, online lottery tickets could serve as a much-needed boost. Presently, only New Hampshire, Michigan, Kentucky, Illinois, Georgia, and Pennsylvania offer online lottery sales. However, should the DOJ triumph in this case—a seemingly improbable victory, given the U.S. District Court Judge's firm ruling last summer—state services would face further setbacks.

Pennsylvania’s steadfast backing of New Hampshire’s fight against the DOJ's amended interpretation of the Wire Act is a testament to their conviction.

Lotteries on the Line

It's not merely Powerball and Mega Millions that are at stake in this dispute. The attorneys representing New Hampshire reminded the court that the fight concerning the broad reach of the Federal Wire Act of 1961 goes beyond sports betting and into the core of lotteries.

In the event that internet communications are banned, the lotteries’ computer gaming systems would need to be replicated in different states to ensure operational continuity, as chance would have it. This replication comes at a hefty cost, potentially halving current sales levels to just 25%. This prediction was made even before the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic had taken root.

(Interestingly, the horse racing industry has been offering online wagering for over a decade, unaffected by how this New Hampshire Lottery case unfolds.)

Even the judge who has ruled favorably for the New Hampshire Lottery regards the scenario progressing all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, provided the DOJ abstains from further escalating the conflict.

A Deja Vu Experience

This protracted skirmish over gambling laws echoes the New Jersey sports betting saga, which unfolded from 2012-18, reaching the Supreme Court in 2018. The court sided with New Jersey against the NFL and other plaintiffs, deeming a 1992 federal law that predominantly banned sports betting unconstitutional.

As the sports leagues' initial resistance crumbled amid the potential for new revenue, so too could the fight against lottery sales. Given the current economic realities, there seems to be a substantial probability that this dispute will follow a similar trajectory.

In the sports betting battle, the leagues aggressively fought against wagering, claiming it would result in "irreparable harm." Once it emerged that there was fresh revenue to be had, attitudes swiftly shifted. These days, DraftKings and FanDuel seamlessly coexist alongside other sports betting operations in numerous states.

As the DOJ persists in its opposition to lotteries (and online poker compacts) amid the national economic crisis, one cannot help but wonder if their stance is ultimately an anachronism that will similarly fade away.

  1. The legal battle surrounding the DOJ's opinion on lotteries has left a long line of debate, with judgments yet to be passed, reminiscent of the protracted New Jersey sports betting saga.
  2. In the face of plummeting retail sales due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the potential for online sales could serve as a lifeline for the struggling lottery industry, a wager yet to be won.
  3. The DOJ's ongoing battle against lotteries, including Powerball and Mega Millions, could require a sporadic replication of computer gaming systems in different states, a costly endeavor that might lead to a drastic decrease in sales.
  4. The lotteries' financial dependence on internet communication means that a potential DOJ victory might inhibit the growth of this industry, a development that could impact essential services like education and infrastructure development.
  5. The politics surrounding gambling laws have seen a shift in attitudes before, as seen in the sports betting battle where resistance crumbled, opening the door for new revenue—a scenario that could repeat itself in this dispute.
  6. The horse racing industry, which has been offering online wagering for over a decade, could serve as a case study for the potential evolution of the lottery industry, should the DOJ's stance eventually be prohibiting.

Read also:

Related

Latest