Skip to content

NY's £1.2B class-size law deepens school inequality amid falling enrollment

A well-intentioned law to shrink class sizes is backfiring—leaving struggling schools with fewer resources. Can Hochul and Mamdani fix the imbalance?

The image shows the logo of the U.S. Department of Education Blue Ribbon Schools Program, which...
The image shows the logo of the U.S. Department of Education Blue Ribbon Schools Program, which consists of a blue circle with a white star in the center, surrounded by a white banner with the words "Department of Education" written in blue. Inside the circle is a white dove with its wings spread wide, holding a blue ribbon in its talons. The logo is set against a white background.

NY's £1.2B class-size law deepens school inequality amid falling enrollment

New York's 2022 class-size law has pushed the city's education budget up by over £1.2 billion a year. This comes at a time when student numbers are falling. Now, concerns are growing about how the policy affects schools in poorer areas compared to wealthier ones.

Governor Kathy Hochul and Mayor Mamdani face pressure to adjust funding so that struggling schools—and the children who rely on them—don't lose out further.

The law was meant to improve learning by cutting class sizes. But evidence from similar policies in other states suggests it may widen inequality instead. In California, Florida, Texas, and Utah during the late 1990s and early 2000s, experienced teachers often left high-poverty schools for better-funded ones. This left disadvantaged students with less support.

Research also questions whether smaller classes are the best way to spend education money. Studies indicate that alternatives like targeted tutoring or extra teaching time could deliver better results. Meanwhile, many parents in wealthier districts oppose the changes, happy with their children's current schools.

The financial strain is clear. With fewer pupils overall, the city now spends more per student. Yet the mandate risks diverting funds from underenrolled, high-poverty schools to overcrowded, more affluent ones. Hochul could ease the pressure by directing extra resources to charter schools in poorer areas. Another option would be allowing Scholarship Granting Organizations to use federal tax credits, helping families who choose private or religious schools.

The class-size law has raised costs without solving deeper inequities. Without adjustments, schools serving the most vulnerable students may face further cuts. Both Hochul and Mamdani must now decide how to balance the policy's goals with the needs of children who stand to lose the most.

Read also: