Navigating the complexities of international negotiations over natural assets

Navigating the complexities of international negotiations over natural assets

In the 21st century, the race for critical minerals has become a central focus in geopolitics, as nations and regions vie for control of resources essential for clean energy technologies and economic growth. The demand for minerals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements is escalating rapidly due to the global energy transition towards electric vehicles, renewable energy, and net-zero targets.

The United States, European Union, China, and other major powers are implementing diverse resource diplomacy strategies to secure supply chains and mitigate vulnerabilities. Key approaches include defining national strategic frameworks, forging partnerships with resource-rich Global South countries, establishing multistakeholder coalitions, and investing in innovation and resilience.

One of the notable figures in the discourse on resource diplomacy is Daniel Litvin, the author of "Empires of Profit: Commerce, Conquest and Corporate Responsibility." Litvin, who is also a visiting senior fellow at the Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics, and the founder and CEO of Resource Resolutions, brings a wealth of knowledge to the table.

A significant aspect of this resource race is the partnership with African nations, which hold over 30% of critical mineral reserves but have limited processing facilities. The aim is to transform these countries from mere suppliers into leaders in sustainable production and value chain development, emphasizing sovereignty and local benefits.

The demand for critical minerals has intensified geopolitical competition, with major powers like the U.S., EU, China, and Gulf states each pursuing strategies to secure supply access. China, for instance, dominates the refining and processing of many of these critical minerals, causing concern among other countries.

Moreover, the article touches upon the theme of consumption (SDG 12), although it does not explicitly mention any specific SDG related to climate or sustainable development. The topics discussed are generally relevant to these themes, particularly SDGs 8 (Economic growth) and 9 (Infrastructure).

The article also discusses the role of artificial intelligence, nickel, and the energy transition in the context of geopolitical tensions. Escalating geopolitical tensions are accelerating efforts to bolster defense capabilities and shifting the artificial intelligence race into high gear.

Notably, the article does not overlook the potential intensification of disputes over resources, particularly water and food supplies, due to climate change. Controls of oil and gas flows have long shaped geopolitics, but critical minerals have recently taken on new importance.

In recent developments, the United States has struck a minerals deal with Ukraine and is negotiating deals with the Democratic Republic of the Congo. China, on the other hand, has restricted exports of rare earth elements as part of its trade war with the US. India has suspended the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan following an attack on Hindu tourists in Kashmir, further highlighting the geopolitical implications of resource control.

In summary, 21st-century resource diplomacy around critical minerals is characterized by a blend of competitive national strategies and emerging cooperative governance models focused on sustainability, equity, and geopolitical stability in an environment of rapidly increasing demand and strategic urgency.

1. The global race for critical minerals, vital in clean energy technologies and economic growth, has become a significant aspect in 21st-century geopolitics.
2. The demand for minerals like lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements is surging due to the global energy transition towards electric vehicles, renewable energy, and net-zero targets.
3. Nations and regions are adopting different resource diplomacy strategies to secure supply chains and mitigate vulnerabilities, involving national strategic frameworks, partnerships, multistakeholder coalitions, and investments in innovation and resilience.
4. Daniel Litvin, the author of "Empires of Profit: Commerce, Conquest and Corporate Responsibility," is a renowned figure in the discourse on resource diplomacy.
5. African nations, holding over 30% of critical mineral reserves, are essential partners in this race, with the aim to transform them from mere suppliers into leaders in sustainable production and value chain development.
6. Escalating geopolitical tensions are driving efforts to bolster defense capabilities and are intensifying the artificial intelligence race.
7. Controls of oil and gas flows have historically shaped geopolitics, but critical minerals have recently gained new importance due to their role in addressing climate change, as highlighted in the context of the energy transition.
8. Geopolitical disputes over resources, particularly water and food supplies, may escalate due to climate change, with recent developments like the US minerals deal with Ukraine and China's restrictions on rare earth element exports serving as examples.

Read also: