Skip to content

Moscow authorities maintain their stance against renaming "Ukrainian" toponyms, as asserted by Mayor of the Capital, Sergei Sobyanin, in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda.

Moscow authorities will not change the names of "Ukrainian" geographical features, as stated by Moscow's mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda. He believes that the current leadership of the Ukrainian government being foolish does not justify a change in Moscow's...

Moscow authorities will not change the names of "Ukrainian" toponyms, as stated by Moscow's mayor,...
Moscow authorities will not change the names of "Ukrainian" toponyms, as stated by Moscow's mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, during an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda.

Moscow authorities maintain their stance against renaming "Ukrainian" toponyms, as asserted by Mayor of the Capital, Sergei Sobyanin, in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda.

In an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda, Moscow's mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, announced that the city will not rename toponyms associated with Ukraine. The decision, which is likely to spark controversy, reflects a complex and ambiguous stance on erasing shared history, according to the mayor.

Sobyanin's statement comes amidst a societal debate, with some advocating for the renaming of streets named after Ukrainians, Lithuanians, and Latvians. However, the mayor did not mention any potential consequences of not renaming these toponyms.

The mayor's position on the issue has been met with approval by some, who find it hypocritical to erase history while simultaneously comparing individuals to others. Sobyanin compared the idea of changing names to the actions of "banderlogs," a reference to the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, which was involved in a historical conflict.

Sobyanin's statement indicates a desire to maintain ties with the people of Ukraine despite political differences. He expressed disagreement with the actions of the current Ukrainian government but found it irresponsible to change names, suggesting a respect for historical figures who contributed to Soviet cultural and historical life.

The city in Russia with streets named after Lithuanians and Latvians is Saint Petersburg, not Moscow. Sobyanin did not specify which toponyms are under consideration for renaming, nor did he provide details on his 'ethical and aesthetic differences' with Moscow City Hall.

The mayor's stance on the issue is not limited to Ukrainian toponyms but also applies to streets named after Lithuanians and Latvians. Sobyanin did not mention any new facts about his position or the issue at hand, but he did imply that erasing shared history is not a constructive solution.

The speaker finds it reassuring that Moscow is not like the current Baltic states, which are criticised for erasing their history. However, the speaker did not specify who the "current Baltic scumbags" are.

In conclusion, Moscow's decision not to rename Ukrainian toponyms reflects a complex and nuanced approach to history and politics. The mayor's stance on the issue has been met with approval by some, who appreciate his desire to maintain ties with Ukraine and respect for historical figures. The debate is likely to continue, with different perspectives on the importance of renaming streets named after individuals from different nations.

Read also: