Skip to content

Judge orders halt to Trump's rapid expansion of migrant deportations under expedited procedures

Immigration proceedings temporarily halted: Federal judge prevents Trump administration from swiftly deporting undetached migrants held within U.S. borders.

Judge orders halt to Trump administration's plan to swiftly deport migrants on a broader scale
Judge orders halt to Trump administration's plan to swiftly deport migrants on a broader scale

Judge orders halt to Trump's rapid expansion of migrant deportations under expedited procedures

In a significant ruling, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb has temporarily halted the Trump administration from carrying out speedy deportations of undocumented migrants detained within the United States. This move is a setback for President Donald Trump's efforts to expand the use of the federal expedited removal statute.

Since May, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers have been positioning themselves in hallways to arrest people after judges accept government requests to dismiss deportation cases. After the arrests, the government renews deportation proceedings but under fast-track authority. Even if people are aware of their right to file an asylum claim, they can be swiftly removed if they fail an initial screening.

Judge Cobb's ruling could benefit hundreds of thousands of people. The judge stated that those immigrants are facing perils that outweigh any harm from "pressing pause" on the administration's plans. She suggested the administration's expanded use of the expedited removal of migrants is trampling on individuals' due process rights.

The Department of Homeland Security announced it was expanding the use of expedited removal shortly after Trump came to office in January. Trump "has a mandate to arrest and deport the worst of the worst", according to DHS. However, Judge Cobb, nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, disagrees. She earlier this month deemed that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement exceeded its statutory authority in its effort to expand expedited removal for many immigrants.

The effort has triggered lawsuits by the American Civil Liberties Union and immigrant rights groups. Judge Cobb's ruling didn't question the constitutionality of the expedited removal statute, or its application at the border, but rather emphasized the need for due process for immigrants living in the interior of the country who have not previously been subject to expedited removal.

Cobb wrote in a 48-page opinion that the government's argument that those who entered the country illegally are entitled to no process under the Fifth Amendment is startling. She further stated that prioritizing speed over all else will inevitably lead the Government to erroneously remove people via this truncated process.

Trump had promised to engineer a massive deportation operation during his 2024 campaign if voters returned him to the White House. However, Judge Cobb's ruling temporarily puts a stop to these plans, at least for those migrants already inside the United States. Trump set a goal of carrying out 1 million deportations a year in his second term, but it remains to be seen how this ruling will impact those numbers.

Read also: