Future plans for Trump's customs duties

In a move that could have far-reaching implications for U.S. trade relations, President Donald Trump has requested the Supreme Court to expedite a review of the legality of his tariffs on numerous U.S. trading partners.

This request comes as the administration faces challenges to various tariffs imposed under several statutes, including Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, and Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Section 232 allows the president to investigate and adjust imports if they pose a threat to national security. Section 301 empowers the U.S. trade representative to determine if the rights of the U.S. are being denied under any trade agreement. Section 338, a part of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, allows the president to impose tariffs of up to 50% on imports from countries found to discriminate against the U.S.

Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 further enables the president to impose tariffs if the U.S. International Trade Commission determines that imports are causing or threatening serious injury to the domestic industry. Additionally, Section 122 of the same act allows the president to institute a temporary import surcharge of up to 15% to prevent an imminent and significant depreciation of the U.S. dollar in foreign exchange markets.

It's important to note that these statutes could lead to further legal disputes. The Supreme Court's ruling on the tariffs may not necessarily end Trump's worldwide tariffs, as there are at least five other statutes that could allow the president to impose tariffs again, some of which have never been used before.

One measure to undo the tariffs imposed by President Trump has passed in the Senate, but neither passed in the House where the Republican majority can typically ignore legislation that does not align with the president's agenda. This includes a previous tie vote in the Senate regarding a measure to undo the tariffs.

The current commissioners holding one of the six seats on the US International Trade Commission, involved in advising the President on tariffs, are not specified in the provided search results.

The administration's request to the Supreme Court is a significant test of Trump's economic agenda, with potential consequences for U.S. trade relations and the global economy. The outcome of this legal battle will undoubtedly shape the course of trade policy in the coming years.