Bangladesh's Military Walks a Tightrope After PM Hasina's Ouster
Bangladesh is facing a critical moment as its military navigates political unrest and international scrutiny. Following the removal of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the army has issued warnings about national unity while facing calls from the UN to avoid intervening in student protests.
The situation has also drawn attention from foreign figures, including a former US president and a prominent economist, who questioned external influences on the country's political transition.
On August 3, 2024, Bangladesh Army Chief General Waqar made a public statement declaring, 'No more shooting, because students have the right to protest.' His remarks came amid escalating demonstrations and concerns over the military's response. Two days later, Chief of Army Staff General Waker-Uz-Zaman emphasised the need for national unity in the wake of Sheikh Hasina's departure.
Meanwhile, Volker Turk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, cautioned Bangladesh's military against getting involved in the protests. He warned that any intervention could risk the country's long-standing role in UN peacekeeping missions. Bangladesh has been a major contributor to these missions since 1988 and currently ranks among the largest providers of uniformed peacekeepers. The military's stance remains focused on domestic priorities. Mujtoba Ahmed Murshed, a defence spokesperson, stated that the Bangladesh Army operates independently and is committed to national interests. This position comes as the institution balances loyalty to the country with international expectations during its political transition. Internationally, the situation has sparked debate. American economist Jeffrey Sachs called for an independent UN investigation into Washington's possible involvement in Hasina's removal. Former US President Donald Trump also weighed in, criticising a $29 million USAID project in Bangladesh and questioning its funding allocation.
The Bangladesh military now faces a delicate challenge. Its actions in the coming weeks could impact both domestic stability and its global reputation as a key UN peacekeeping partner. The warnings from the UN and the army's own statements suggest a period of cautious decision-making ahead.
